You’d think the two Democrats and one Republican senator who works for the presidency would be on different sides of the issue of amnesty for illegal aliens. Especially since all votes in the Senate this year on this issue, most of the Republicans was on one side of the problem and most of the Democrats on the other side. All three of these candidates voted consistently in support of amnesty for illegal aliens.
It is not the amnesty issue, I wonder why these three are not concerned for the safety of our country, but how far they are willing to take the matter. All three voted for YES on comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill in June 2007. This bill would have granted amnesty to all illegal aliens in the country. They also voted against an amendment to this bill that would have granted amnesty to most illegal aliens, but would have barred those who had committed major crimes during his stay in our country illegally. I just do not understand how anyone could think that a politician cares about the safety and security of the people they represent when they are ready for these criminals who are here illegally, amnesty and a path to citizenship to bless.
All three voted against the Cornyn amendment (SA 1184) to S. 1385. S 1385 is an amendment to the comprehensive Immigration Reform Act that would have given amnesty to illegal aliens. The amendment would have barred illegal aliens Cornyn the following crimes from receiving amnesty.
1. Absconder (ie, aliens already ordered deported)
2. aliens inadmissible and deport as security risks table (eg terrorists)
3. aliens who do not register as a sex offender
4. aliens convicted of certain firearms offenses
5. aliens convicted of domestic violence, stalking, crimes against children, or violation of protection orders
6. alien gang members
7. aliens convicted of at least three Duis.
I think these three is in the best interest of the safety of our country and the safety of its citizens to give amnesty to people who come into this county illegally and commit major crimes. None of these candidates that this issue or their votes on this amendment on the campaign, so I will proclaim loud and clear to them, so there is no question of a mistake where they stand.
We, Being John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama believes it is in the best interest of our national security and the safety of the citizens of this country to amnesty for illegal aliens who are considered to be any reason to be security risks our country.
We, Being John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama believes it is in the best interest of our national security and the safety of the citizens of this country to amnesty for illegal aliens who are convicted of sexual crimes and refuse to register as sex offenders.
We, Being John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama believes it is in the best interest of our national security and the safety of the citizens of this country to give amnesty to people in this country illegally and illegal weapons to carry with them .
We, Being John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama believes it is in the best interest of our national security and the safety of the citizens of this country to amnesty for illegal immigrants who commit crimes against children and abuse their families.
We, Being John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama believes it is in the best interest of our national security and the safety of the citizens of this country to illegal aliens amnesty to members of alien gangs. We do not think there is enough of a gang problem here in our country and are committed to see that gangs from other countries to start operations here.
And last but not least, we, John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama believes it is in the best interest of our national security and the safety of the citizens of this country to amnesty for illegal aliens who have been three times arrested for driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol.
I’ve searched for any indication by any of these candidates, the reasons why they voted this way and I’m unable to make any place where she explained why she voted against the security of our country and the safety of its citizens to find. I assume that this information is not there because there is simply no justification for such a vote. They have played their hand and now we see how little they care for the safety of America. I know that each of these candidates have good points and support the views that many Americans agree. But how cans every intelligent citizen who has been informed about their position on this issue, in good conscience vote for them.


Other Immigration sites:

Reasonable people may disagree on the parameters of the illegal immigration problem, and the shape of the solution, but the words “illegal” and “the law” miss the mark.

Nevertheless, I recognize that “the law” is human-made and therefore fallible. Not so long ago, “the law” required black men and women to live as slaves, and declared it a crime to assist escaping slaves. Not so long ago, “the law” prohibited women from voting. The mere fact
that an act is illegal does not end the discussion.

The important question is whether the law effectively protects the freedoms we cherish.

When “the law” is used to dismiss individuals and activities as criminal, the important questions remain unasked:

Have our border enforcement activities to date actually slowed illegal entry? Are U.S. international trade policies complicit in the economic problems driving so many to immigrate? Are the bureaucratic, financial and physical barriers to legal entry too high? Are American citizens losing jobs to immigrants? How does the increased cost in social services to immigrants compare to increased tax revenues and income to local economies where immigrants work and purchase goods and services?

If it is true, as one interviewee stated, “We’re not responsible to take care of the world,” what are we responsible for? Most importantly, is it possible to forge a new legal system that treats immigrants with compassion and respect while recognizing a sovereign nation’s right to control its borders and obligation to meet the basic needs of its citizens?

We need to read about the horrible conditions they are fleeing from — the poverty, the hunger and the desperation.

In short, rather than asking what the law requires, we must dig deeper and ask what we, the people require of our laws.

We must all Support President Obama in passing the New Immigration Reform Bill !

Obama pledged to “again pursue comprehensive immigration reform” and said he is “committed to reforming our system in a way that is tough, fair and practical.”

Watch the Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi17AYMESJ0

***** Here are few points to be addressed *****

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/immigration/

1) Strengthen Border Control
2) Remove Incentives to Enter Illegally
3) Bring People Out of the Shadows
4) Harsh Punishment for Business that hire illegals
5) Work with Mexico, to promote economic development in Mexico to decrease the economic desperation that leads to illegal immigration.
“3) Bring People Out of the Shadows”

Means Taxing them, No more Freebies!
rckfrom1966 Said “Think of this problem on a smaller scale. Do I have the right to come into your house, uninvited, and eat your food, watch your tv, and sleep on your bed because you make more money than I do? Yes or no?”

It depends on the relationship between you and me, If you are related to me or my friend you do, but guess this isn’t a question of 2 houses. Its question of 10 – 20 million people.

I cannot comment about Iran, because many of innocent will die and still no change will be there. Do you agree? I hope for something positive this time for the Iranians too.
We would always talk about Civil & Human Rights Violations of people in countries like Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, North Korea, China etc… While ignoring 10 – 20 Millions without any rights in our farms, restaurants, warehouses and factories…
Viva La Raza said “how about sending the whities back to europe”

This is as true as sending all Mexican back to Mexico, use your brain!
Joel said “They don’t have the education to tax.. they will become welfare dependent for the rest of their lives essentially.”

Are you or anyone you know is living on Welfare for his life? What a joke, I believe people would only take welfare if unemployed.
Sasori said “You do realize that someone making under $30,000 a year with several dependents will not become a tax payer. With EITC and Child Tax Credit he will receive twice what he pays in.”

Is it that only illegal do this? aren’t people already doing it? Why blame everything on illegals?

“Who is without sin among you let throw a stone at illegals” says everyone
“Amnesty Will Cost U.S. Taxpayers at Least $2.6 Trillion”

What a genius, he who predicted this, should have predicted the fall of GM, AIG, Lehman etc… We would not have problem at all!

What about fall of your and my house prices? where were these gurus?

They are nothing but bull ;)